“I’m a Hindu,” she said, “and I just don’t think it would be right for me to impose my prayers on other people at a school event that’s supposed to be for everybody.”
when-praying-at-graduation-silence-is-golden

But as a religious minority in the U.S. the dynamic may be totally different than it might be in a hindu dominated society.

Christians should not feel singled out of rulings which limit things which could be said at public school graduations. I am sure nods to other religions likely also be edited. For instance, if a student claimed that he or she removed obstacles by appeasing saturn, that would likely be edited, especially if they repeated a shani mantra during a speech.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYdgdKjOv3E&feature=related

Wow! I don’t even know where to begin. The hyperbole is flying left and right. Have you even read Brittany’s full unedited speech? It did not simply have a few references to God and one reference to Jesus, it was very much like a sermon.

The ACLU did not scrub all references to religion in her speech; it did not scrub anything at all. The school consulted with the ACLU, and then the school edited some religious references, but not all. The school was not concerned that Brittany mentioned God or Jesus in her speech, but that she was evangelizing. Here is text from Brittany’s original speech:

“His love fits. His love is “that something more” we all desire. It’s unprejudiced, it’s merciful, it’s free, it’s real, it’s huge and it’s everlasting. God’s love is so great that he gave His only son up to an excruciating death on a cross so His blood would cover all our shortcomings and provide for us a way to heaven in accepting this grace.
This is why Christ died. John 10:10 says He died so we no longer have to reach in vain for the magnificence of the stars and find we always fall short, so we can have life — and life to the fullest. ”

In short, Brittany was evangelizing.

Personally, I feel that our 1st amendment gives valevictorians the right to say whatever they want, unless their speech incites a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely. They’re not public officials, and therefore don’t fall under the “establishment of religion” restrictions. Students should be permitted to witness for Christ, Allah, or the Great Spaghetti Monster during their graduation speeches.

Having said that, however, saying that students should be granted the freedom to evangelize during a graduation ceremony at a public high school, does not mean that they should do so. To evangelize under such conditions is tone deaf; it shows a lack of grace. Families and friends gather at public graduation ceremonies to honor the educational accomplishments of their children, not to be told that their faith or lack of faith is wrong.