blog 
Eternal Entitlements
While reading The Peacegiver by James L. Ferrell, I was impressed by part of an insightful conversation between two main characters in the book. They were discussing the topic of entitlements, as one of the characters, Ricky, felt he deserved to be loved and supported by his wife with whom he had been having marital troubles. The other character, Ricky’s grandfather, commented:
It is true that we are commanded to love and honor others, and it is likely true that Carol fails always to do that—just as you and I fail. But what’s false is this idea that you or I deserve that love and devotion—that we are somehow entitled to it. The truth is that there is only one thing we truly deserve, and that’s to be sent to hell—you, Carol, me, Jonah, Nineveh, all of us. Love and salvation are gifts. How grateful we should be to receive them in any measure!
Hell is all we could ever hope for, Ricky, if it weren’t for the redeeming power of the Savior’s atonement. It is only his love, offered not because we deserve it but even though we do not, that saves us. We don’t want what we deserve, believe me…. Our only hope is to receive what we don’t deserve—the mercy that brings the gift of eternal life. (The Peacegiver, pp. 96-7)
That passage reminded me of the following powerful verses:
And men are instructed sufficiently that they know good from evil. And the law is given unto men. And by the law no flesh is justified; or, by the law men are cut off. Yea, by the temporal law they were cut off; and also, by the spiritual law they perish from that which is good, and become miserable forever.
Wherefore, redemption cometh in and through the Holy Messiah; for he is full of grace and truth.
Behold, he offereth himself a sacrifice for sin, to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a contrite spirit; and unto none else can the ends of the law be answered.
Wherefore, how great the importance to make these things known unto the inhabitants of the earth, that they may know that there is no flesh that can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits, and mercy, and grace of the Holy Messiah, who layeth down his life according to the flesh, and taketh it again by the power of the Spirit, that he may bring to pass the resurrection of the dead, being the first that should rise. (2 Ne. 2:5-8)
What do we deserve? Hell. Eternal punishment. Expulsion from God’s presence.
But praise be to the Lord that because of the Savior’s atonement, we can receive mercy—a gift. That mercy doesn’t rob justice, yet it satisfies the demand of law and brings us back into God’s presence.
Without the atonement, our eternal entitlement would be everlasting punishment, having been exposed to justice. With it, our entitlement is glory, peace, everlasting dominion, and eternal lives. The latter sounds far better, if you ask me.
As Ricky’s grandfather said, we don’t want what we truly deserve. Thankfully, it is by Christ’s grace that we are saved, after and despite all we can do. Our charge is to be perfect in Him, not like Him. Only then will our true entitlement be changed in our favor. Thank the heavens for that.
***************
8 comments so far. Care to chime in?
#3 Aaron | April 30th, 2007 4:09 PMI don’t like the word “deserve” It carries an interesting and powerful connotation in our language, and I don’t think it’s a helpful word while discussing the atonement. A quick search of the online scriptures reveals that this word only appears twice in the scriptures (both in the old testament). In one of those instances, I admit it is used within the same context as the above post.
I like the teachings in Alma, when the prophet is teaching his son about the concept of restoration. Essentially, we will inherit what we want! How wonderful.
It’s not a matter of “deserving” something or not. We will inherit the desires of our heart.It’s hard for me to explain my aversion to the word “deserve”. I will have to give it some thought. Along this topic of mercy and grade, I envision a concept that synthesizes the atonement, restoration as explained by Alma, and the scripture found in Doctrine and Covenants 45_3-5:
3 Listen to him who is the aadvocate with the Father, who is pleading your cause before him—
4 Saying: Father, behold the asufferings and bdeath of him who did no csin, in whom thou wast well pleased; behold the blood of thy Son which was shed, the blood of him whom thou gavest that thyself might be dglorified;
5 Wherefore, Father, spare these my abrethren that bbelieve on my name, that they may come unto me and have ceverlasting life.I see it all in a more simplistic manner: God loves us as our father. The Savior atoned for our sins. He will save us all, if that is what we want. (I might go so far as to say “He will save us all, when we want it”, but I’m not sure on that one–and that’s a different topic.) I think too often we focus on our actions, deserving or not. The scripture above reminds us that it is all about Christ.
I don’t write this to argue–as I do agree with your thoughts on the matter. It’s just that I am thinking about that particular word choice.
Aaron,
I think I understand your hesitancy to accept the word “deserve” in relation to the point of this post. Deserving something equates to justice—in other words, we are getting exactly what we have “earned”. As the verses cited above show, that would be eternal banishment. But instead, we are able to receive mercy and forgo what we truly deserve (or have earned on our own merits), choosing instead to “[rely] wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save” (2 Ne. 31:19).
#5 Aaron | May 1st, 2007 10:17 AMConnor,
Yes, partly that is the reason for my hesitancy. In addition, I don’t always think we have the correct perspective on what people might “deserve”. And example:
So my son talks back to me, then hits his sister, then cusses, breaks the window, and walks off down the street. What does he “deserve”? Some parenting “experts” might say he deserves “x” punishment (they sugar-coat it by using the word consequence). There is a widely-accepted notion that when somebody does something bad, something bad must happen to them (because they deserve it). Continuing with the above example, I am not sure that my son would deserve any punishment. I would need to look at all the factors involved. Why did he do what he did? Most importantly, what course of action would give him the greatest opportunity of repenting and moving forward? A punishment (in the classic sense) might not be the solution (and rarely is it a solution).Does this make any sense?
I understand that justice keeps us sinners from the presence of God. This is taught clearly in the scriptures. I don’t think God ever has the intention of punishing us, though. All of Jesus’ actions teach us otherwise.
I am great at nit-picking with semantics. In this case, I think it’s important, though. Our Mormon culture (not to be confused with Mormon doctrine) has a pervasive paranoia that revolves around weighing/judging our actions to determine our worthiness. This is a harmful mindset, and I’ve seen too many people worry too much about being deserving of God’s grace.
Great conversation. Thanks for the response.
#6 shestalou | May 1st, 2007 10:57 AMWell said Aaron I agree totally with your perspective after all the world was created for his greatest love of all, his children.
#7 Richard K Miller | May 7th, 2007 12:34 PMI listened to The Peacegiver on tape and liked it a lot. One of my favorite points was that Christ forgives the people who offend and hurt us, so we can’t withhold our forgiveness from them.
#8 Aaron | May 7th, 2007 3:52 PMJust started the book yesterday. It had been sitting on my shelf for some time, and Connor’s post reminded me to pick it up. I found the author’s perspective on the Atonement very helpful and enlightening. I loved his use of the story of David, Nabal and Abigail–this story truly helps us understand another important component in the atonement. I look forward to finishing the book.
Post a comment
what's new
Featuring 852 posts w/ 14,374 comments.
Search the blog
Media/Events
- Every Tuesday: The Boyack Review
- 2/9/12 Op-ed, Davis Clipper
- 2/3/12 Mitt Romney faces competition for Nevada's Mormon vote (The Independent)
- 2/2/12 KNRS (radio)
- 2/2/12 Latter-day Candidates (The Daily)
- 2/2/12 Nevada Mormons for Mitt (National Review Online)
- 1/30/12 Ron Paul's Appealing to Mormons (U.S. News and World Report)
- 1/13/12 Latter-day Saints for Ron Paul Nationwide Coalition
- 1/12/12 Op-ed, Daily Caller
- 1/12/12 Op-ed, Davis Clipper
- 1/3/12 KNRS (radio)
- 12/31/11 Op-ed, Salt Lake Tribune
- 12/31/11 K-TALK (radio)
- 12/26/11 Op-ed, Daily Herald
- 12/14/11 Freedom Watch (TV)
- 12/8/11 ABC4 (TV)
- 12/2/11 KHQN (radio)
- 12/1/11 KNRS (radio)
- 12/1/11 K-TALK (radio)
- 11/29/11 KZNU (radio)
- View all media/events »
Recent Comments 
- Gil on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Ralph Hughes on Why Do Latter-day Saints Ignore Ron Paul?
- Phil on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Steve B on The "Public Safety" Police State Ploy
- Jon on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Jon on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Jon on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- TRON on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Gil on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Phil on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Jon on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Gil on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- iamse7en on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Ender on Why Do Latter-day Saints Ignore Ron Paul?
- Brandon on A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- View extended list »
Most Commented
- Why Do Latter-day Saints Ignore Ron Paul? (360)
- Why I’m For Ron Paul and Against Mitt Romney (272)
- Religion and Politics: The LDS Church and Proposition 8 (168)
- The Protected Class of Sexuality (156)
- Outrage Over a Shoe (154)
- Breaking: New Anti-Proposition 8 Campaign to Target LDS Church President Thomas S. Monson (152)
- Of Mosques, Mormons, and Mob Mentality (140)
- Brigham Young on Public Education (136)
- Council on Foreign Relations (130)
- Glenn Beck’s Broad Brush (128)
- The Chameleon-Like Qualities of Mitt Romney’s Conservatism (126)
- FLDS Petition Conclusion (121)
- Domestic Enemies of the Constitution (120)
- Harry Reid Against the “Right Wingers” (117)
- President Packer, Straw Men, and the Pro-LGBT Propagandists (117)
- Health Care Hocus Pocus (115)
- Media Blacklisting Ron Paul (111)
- Latter-day Saints for Ron Paul (110)
- On President Hinckley’s “War and Peace” (107)
- Monarchial Remnants (103)
- View extended list »
Recent Posts
- A Mormon Leader's Promotion of Peace
- Rights Precede and Supercede the Government
- The "Public Safety" Police State Ploy
- A Mormon People in Need of Reform
- Latter-day Saints and Liberty: Church Priorities vs. Member Responsibilities
- The Signature Heard 'Round the World
- Latter-day Saints for Ron Paul
- Should Mormons vote for Mitt Romney?
- The War on Drugs is a War on American Citizens
- Government, a Defective Product
- Highland's Justified Food Freedom Ordinance
- Persuasion vs. Coercion: Taking a Real Stand
- Prayers for Peace, Free Principles, and Protection
- Is Libertarianism Compatible With Mormonism?
- My Letter to a Senator Hatch Re-Election Campaign Staffer
- The Addictive Drug that Government Will Never Prohibit
- Opposing Marijuana Criminalization
- Seduction, Deception, Entrapment, and the FBI
- I Am Not a Statistic
- The Myth of Political Representation
- View extended list »
Church Talks
- The Consistency of Christian Character
- On the Necessity of Repentance
- Why the Latter-day Saints Prepare
- The Family: A Proclamation to the World
- For the Strength of Youth—Service to Others
- For the Strength of Youth—Honesty
- For the Strength of Youth—Music and Dance
- For the Strength of Youth—Entertainment and Media
- For the Strength of Youth—Family
- Inviting the Savior Into Our Home Through Worship
- Gratitude
Aaaaarchives
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (6)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (6)
- May 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (6)
- December 2010 (4)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (8)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (6)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (6)
- March 2010 (5)
- February 2010 (6)
- January 2010 (7)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (7)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (8)
- June 2009 (6)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (7)
- March 2009 (8)
- February 2009 (8)
- January 2009 (10)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (13)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (9)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (7)
- April 2008 (9)
- March 2008 (12)
- February 2008 (10)
- January 2008 (11)
- December 2007 (11)
- November 2007 (14)
- October 2007 (12)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (20)
- July 2007 (7)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (21)
- April 2007 (23)
- March 2007 (26)
- February 2007 (23)
- January 2007 (29)
- December 2006 (33)
- November 2006 (55)
- October 2006 (62)
- September 2006 (27)
- August 2006 (32)
- July 2006 (68)
- June 2006 (26)
featured shtuff
follow me on
twitter
PORTFOLIO
Web/print design and development (and other stuff!), done right.
TENTH AMENDMENT
Liberty through decentralization.
INTRASTATE COMMERCE
Upholding the 10th Amendment to Benefit Utah Commerce.
UTAH NULLIFICATION
A tool for state sovereignty in the hands of every legislator.
QUOTY
Save and tag your favorite quotes, and share w/ your friends!
BOOK OF MORMON
Join Elder Holland in declaring your witness to the world!
UTAH PREPPERS
Preparing Deseret, one blogger at a time.
POLITICAL RESTORATION
Restore the Republic! Join the Ron Paul Campaign for Liberty.











