<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Search Indexing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing</link>
	<description>Rants and musings about things political, philosophical, and religious.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-24759</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-24759</guid>
		<description>Indexing is (and has been for some time now) open to the world.  The work is progressing very rapidly, and in this month&#039;s Ensign is further publicized by &lt;a href=&quot;http://lds.org/portal/site/LDSOrg/menuitem.b12f9d18fae655bb69095bd3e44916a0/?vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&amp;locale=0&amp;sourceId=22af44584a204110VgnVCM100000176f620a____&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; explaining the ins and outs of indexing.  

I was also pleased to discover (via the graphic inside the Ensign of the program running on a G4 powerbook) that the Java-based program is now available on a mac!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indexing is (and has been for some time now) open to the world.  The work is progressing very rapidly, and in this month&#8217;s Ensign is further publicized by <a href="http://lds.org/portal/site/LDSOrg/menuitem.b12f9d18fae655bb69095bd3e44916a0/?vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&#038;locale=0&#038;sourceId=22af44584a204110VgnVCM100000176f620a____" rel="nofollow">this article</a> explaining the ins and outs of indexing.  </p>
<p>I was also pleased to discover (via the graphic inside the Ensign of the program running on a G4 powerbook) that the Java-based program is now available on a mac!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-11292</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-11292</guid>
		<description>I got a new message from headquarters today (that sounds so Dick Tracy-esque):

&lt;blockquote&gt;You [all the &quot;indexing patrons&quot;] have indexed almost 29.5 million names during the first quarter of 2007.  We currently have about 33 thousand indexers and over one hundred people are joining the workforce every day. The enthusiasm for this work is phenomenal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow!  As the previous comment shows, in January there were 3.5 million records indexed.  The following two months saw &lt;em&gt;26 million&lt;/em&gt; more records indexed.  That&#039;s an &lt;em&gt;amazing&lt;/em&gt; increase in numbers.  I am in awe at how quickly this project is progressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a new message from headquarters today (that sounds so Dick Tracy-esque):</p>
<blockquote><p>You [all the "indexing patrons"] have indexed almost 29.5 million names during the first quarter of 2007.  We currently have about 33 thousand indexers and over one hundred people are joining the workforce every day. The enthusiasm for this work is phenomenal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow!  As the previous comment shows, in January there were 3.5 million records indexed.  The following two months saw <em>26 million</em> more records indexed.  That&#8217;s an <em>amazing</em> increase in numbers.  I am in awe at how quickly this project is progressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-7511</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-7511</guid>
		<description>When I opened the Indexing program today I received the following message from Church Headquarters:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Using FamilySearch Indexing you indexed 114,345 names in January of 2006 compared to this past January of 2007 when you indexed 3,659,329 names. In just one year, we have seen an incredible increase in production of about 32 times as many names. Each one of you contributed to this amazing growth. Thank you very much and keep up the great work!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whoa, that&#039;s quite the increase in user adoption and volunteer work!  I&#039;ve heard estimates that with this new software enabling us to pump through names a lot quicker, all the records in the Church&#039;s granite vaults could be indexed and digitized within 2-3 years.  Exciting stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I opened the Indexing program today I received the following message from Church Headquarters:</p>
<blockquote><p>Using FamilySearch Indexing you indexed 114,345 names in January of 2006 compared to this past January of 2007 when you indexed 3,659,329 names. In just one year, we have seen an incredible increase in production of about 32 times as many names. Each one of you contributed to this amazing growth. Thank you very much and keep up the great work!</p></blockquote>
<p>Whoa, that&#8217;s quite the increase in user adoption and volunteer work!  I&#8217;ve heard estimates that with this new software enabling us to pump through names a lot quicker, all the records in the Church&#8217;s granite vaults could be indexed and digitized within 2-3 years.  Exciting stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-848</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-843</guid>
		<description>First of all, it&#039;s myfamily.com, not .org.

Second of all, they are pretty much one and the same. From MyFamily.com&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfamilyinc.com/default.aspx?html=copyright&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;copyright page&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;MyFamily.com, Inc. (we, us or our) owns and operates the World Wide websites MyFamily.com, Ancestry.com, Ancestry.co.uk, Genealogy.com, RootsWeb.com and Ancestry.ca.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lastly, this post has nothing to do with this company.  This is referring to the church&#039;s efforts in family history, which is not affiliated with this private company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, it&#8217;s myfamily.com, not .org.</p>
<p>Second of all, they are pretty much one and the same. From MyFamily.com&#8217;s <a href="http://www.myfamilyinc.com/default.aspx?html=copyright" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">copyright page</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>MyFamily.com, Inc. (we, us or our) owns and operates the World Wide websites MyFamily.com, Ancestry.com, Ancestry.co.uk, Genealogy.com, RootsWeb.com and Ancestry.ca.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lastly, this post has nothing to do with this company.  This is referring to the church&#8217;s efforts in family history, which is not affiliated with this private company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/family-search-indexing#comment-841</guid>
		<description>As an ametuer geneologist I rarely count on MyFamily.org for any degree of accuracy.  It seems to me (and I might be wrong) that it is just another tool to move the Mormon football down the field.  Yes Mormonism and politics again.  Ancestry.com seems to have an unbiased agenda which is something I cant say about MyFamily.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ametuer geneologist I rarely count on MyFamily.org for any degree of accuracy.  It seems to me (and I might be wrong) that it is just another tool to move the Mormon football down the field.  Yes Mormonism and politics again.  Ancestry.com seems to have an unbiased agenda which is something I cant say about MyFamily.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.connorboyack.com @ 2012-02-12 04:52:29 -->
