blog 
Mitt Romney and Religion in the Presidency
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
The Bloggernacle Times recently posted a portion of a Wall Street Journal article about Mitt Romney and his potential problems if he seeks the presidential candidacy. Much has already been said on this issue, but I’d like to offer my two cents. From the article:
Mr. Romney said he does not believe that there should be any religious test applied for politicians. While voters will “select individuals who are people of faith,” he says the “brand of faith” should not matter. Political leaders “follow the law of the land” and shouldn’t substitute the Constitution for a religious text.
Our country, since its inception, has always had a public religion based in the Judeo-Christian belief system. Because of this, Americans have always sought out a president who shared similar beliefs and morals. When John F. Kennedy was thick in his campaign, he had to placate the public on the matter of his Catholic religion, and appeal to their acceptance and implementation of the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights.
From the recommended book American Gospel: God, the Founding Fathers, and the Making of a Nation, here is an excerpt talking about JFK’s presidental campaign:
Nearly half a century on, Ted Sorensen could still remember the letters: a flood of them, from all over, attacking John Kennedy’s Catholicism in the 1960 presidential campaign. “The single biggest obstacle to his election was his religion,” said Sorensen, Kennedy’s speechwriter and special counsel. “You should have seen the hate mail that came in, both from rednecks and from liberal intellectuals who should have known better.”
In a time where so many people are eager to speak before they think, it will be interesting to see what slanderous filth is flung in Romney’s face, just as it was in the face of JFK, if he indeed decides to seek the presidential office.
From a Salt Lake Tribune article about the majority of LDS belonging to the GOP:
“I’m thinking Mormons are going to get pretty disgusted with what I believe they’ll do to Romney,” [Democratic State Party Chairman Wayne] Holland says. He predicts some in the party will be “tearing Romney apart because of his faith.”
Ah, I’m sure Jesus would approve of that… Whether the Bible-belt Baptists (after attending their “How to use lies, slander, and deceit to attack the Mormons” classes) and extreme evangelists like to admit it or not, Mormons are Christians. They believe in God. They worship Jesus Christ. They lead good lives. They have families and build homes of love and peace. They volunteer. They serve others. They reach out.
So, it would seem to me that Mitt Romney, being a Mormon, would have more in common with other (alleged) Christians than not. In fact, he probably is one of the few politicians, claiming to be of the Christian faith, who actually practices that faith.
Why, then, are people using this “pro” as a “con”? How is this positive being turned into a negative?
I think it all boils down to flat ignorance. Some people think his being a Mormon means he will turn the USA into a theocracy, force everybody to wear mormon underwear, and re-institute polygamy. If these people would simply inform themselves before freaking out in the public and private arena, they would come to see that Romney is a good man. He’s got a good track record. He loves his wife. He has morals, and he sticks to them. He doesn’t lie, steal, cheat, drink, commit adultery, or do any number of things our current and previous politicians have been caught red-handed doing. I echo Senator Orrin Hatch’s sentiments, when he said “I believe he is everything everyone would want in a political leader.”
So why all the fuss? Do people want to apply some sort of religious litmus test to presidential hopefuls? Of course not.
People fear what they do not know. Being that many people don’t know and understand the simple Christian tenets of the doctrine of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the “Mormons”), it is my opinion that they are attacking Mitt Romney out of fear, out of ignorance, and out of unchristian attitudes and practices.
“Well, I personally believe that Jesus Christ is my savior.”
—Governor Mitt Romney
Go get ‘em, Mitt!
[UPDATE: CBN has an interview posted with Gov. Romney that's worth watching. ]
Possibly related posts:- Masquerading Mitt
- Who Won’t Vote for Mitt Romney?
- My Letter to the Editor
- Epitome of a Politician
- Harry Reid and First Presidency Opposition
5 comments so far. Care to chime in?
#1 Richard K Miller on June 22nd, 2006Good post, Connor. I hope and suspect that if Mitt runs and wins the primary, Christian conservatives everywhere will at least realize he’d be more favorable to their views than a Hillary or a John Kerry.
#2 Jeff Day on June 28th, 2006I realize this thread is about politics more than doctrine, but…
“They believe in God. They worship Jesus Christ. They lead good lives. They have families and build homes of love and peace. They volunteer. They serve others. They reach out.”
I’m sorry, but I take offense to that. No, not the volunteering, reaching out, and living good lives, etc… But the “They worship Jesus Christ” part. Mormons worship and pray to God the Father. We believe Jesus Christ is the Savior, but Jesus declines receiving worship in the Bible, and at least I do not worship Jesus Christ, as this would be putting another God above the Father, and is contrary to the first of the Ten Commandments.
Other Mormons may disagree, but every scripture I have read seems to be supportive of my focus of Worship. Jesus is the Savior, I have reverence and respect for him, but he wanted all Glory to go to the Father. It was Satan who wanted Glory to be given to himself, instead of the Father.
I worship God the Father. What I believe in, is technically called Henotheism, i believe. That there are multiple Gods/Godesses, but only one to whom I pray and offer worship.
~Jeff, a “Mormon Gnostic”
#4 Latter-day Conservative on July 6th, 2006Wouldn’t it be great to have a mormon President? Yes, but not a socialist, as Mitt has shown that he is via his mandatory healthcare mandate.
Rather than reply to your post about Romney being a socialist, I’ll direct you to this rebuttal of your blog’s post about the same issue.
Post a comment
what's new
Featuring 609 posts w/ 7,307 comments.
Search the blog
Recent Comments 
- Bill on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Bill on The Inherent Immorality of our Banking System
- Bill on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Bill on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Jeff T. on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Connor on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- ji on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Connor on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- ji on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Carissa on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Connor on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- ji on Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- Matthew Piccolo on The Inherent Immorality of our Banking System
- Reach Upward on The Inherent Immorality of our Banking System
- Jesse Harris on The Inherent Immorality of our Banking System
- View extended list »
Most Commented
- Why Do Latter-day Saints Ignore Ron Paul? (329)
- Why I'm For Ron Paul and Against Mitt Romney (254)
- The Protected Class of Sexuality (149)
- FLDS Petition Conclusion (120)
- Health Care Hocus Pocus (115)
- Council on Foreign Relations (114)
- Harry Reid Against the "Right Wingers" (114)
- Brigham Young on Public Education (113)
- Media Blacklisting Ron Paul (110)
- Domestic Enemies of the Constitution (109)
- On President Hinckley's "War and Peace" (106)
- Monarchial Remnants (103)
- The Rights of an Embryo (98)
- Some Questions on 9/11 (95)
- Constitutional Questions (85)
- The Bare Minimum (79)
- True Competition in the Educational System (75)
- Weighing in on the Utah Voucher Program (74)
- Virginia Tech and Gun Control (74)
- Fascism for the FLDS (74)
- View extended list »
Recent Posts
- The Inherent Immorality of our Banking System
- Apathetic Until It Hits Your Wallet
- Domestic Enemies of the Constitution
- CotM: Invisible Children
- The Laws of Wickedness and America's Demise
- The Bigger They Are, The Softer They Fall
- Police Glorification
- We Will Never Forget
- Chaffetz v. Spencer: Round 1
- On Claims of Alienation
- A Snapshot of a Community's Preparedness
- The Rights of an Embryo
- The Child Soldier
- CotM: Smile Train
- For the Strength of Youth—Music and Dance
- Reciprocal Charity Equals Equality
- Our Own Tests of Faith
- Capitalism and Charity
- The Protected Class of Sexuality
- Coping With Sudden Change
- View extended list »
Aaaaarchives
- October 2008 (2)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (9)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (7)
- April 2008 (9)
- March 2008 (12)
- February 2008 (10)
- January 2008 (11)
- December 2007 (11)
- November 2007 (14)
- October 2007 (12)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (20)
- July 2007 (7)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (21)
- April 2007 (24)
- March 2007 (26)
- February 2007 (23)
- January 2007 (29)
- December 2006 (34)
- November 2006 (55)
- October 2006 (63)
- September 2006 (27)
- August 2006 (32)
- July 2006 (68)
- June 2006 (26)
- January 2006 (1)
featured shtuff
PORTFOLIO
Web/print design and development (and other stuff!), done right.
QUOTY
Save and tag your favorite quotes, and share w/ your friends!
LIBERTY LUNCH
Mixing patriotism, conversation, and good food. Join us!
LEADERSHIP EDUCATION
To build men and women of virtue, wisdom, diplomacy, and courage who inspire greatness in others and move the cause of liberty.
CONGRESS
Time to boot the sycophants out of office and clean house!
POLITICAL RESTORATION
Restore the Republic! Join the Ron Paul Campaign for Liberty.
BOOK LIST
Here's what I'm currently reading.












