<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Softballing Presidential Debates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates</link>
	<description>Rants and musings about things political, philosophical, and religious.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-46010</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-46010</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I just think it is mildly ironic that you use the same kind of questionable rhetoric that you disparage in the preceding paragraph&#8230;&lt;/em&gt;

Ah, good ol&#039; &lt;em&gt;argumentum ad populum&lt;/em&gt;.  I don&#039;t think &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_popularity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this fallacy&lt;/a&gt; applies here.  I&#039;m not saying that &quot;most people agree that RP is the only presidential candidate...&quot;, but instead that they &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; think that way, regardless of what popular opinion is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I just think it is mildly ironic that you use the same kind of questionable rhetoric that you disparage in the preceding paragraph&hellip;</em></p>
<p>Ah, good ol&#8217; <em>argumentum ad populum</em>.  I don&#8217;t think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_popularity" rel="nofollow">this fallacy</a> applies here.  I&#8217;m not saying that &#8220;most people agree that RP is the only presidential candidate&#8230;&#8221;, but instead that they <em>should</em> think that way, regardless of what popular opinion is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-45983</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-45983</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Not only do most of the candidates not offer anything that a rational mind would determine to be well thought out and morally principled.....

.....every honest American with a brain on should agree that Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate....&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Note: the second sentence is a variation on the classic fallacy of  &quot;Appeal to Popularity.&quot;

I&#039;m not saying I don&#039;t agree with you, Dr. Paul has easily come out on the top of exit polls, at nearly every major debate he&#039;s attended.

I just think it is mildly ironic that you use the same kind of questionable rhetoric that you disparage in the preceding paragraph....:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Not only do most of the candidates not offer anything that a rational mind would determine to be well thought out and morally principled&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8230;..every honest American with a brain on should agree that Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Note: the second sentence is a variation on the classic fallacy of  &#8220;Appeal to Popularity.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I don&#8217;t agree with you, Dr. Paul has easily come out on the top of exit polls, at nearly every major debate he&#8217;s attended.</p>
<p>I just think it is mildly ironic that you use the same kind of questionable rhetoric that you disparage in the preceding paragraph&#8230;.:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-45818</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-45818</guid>
		<description>The media is giving the American people exactly what they ask for. Frightening isn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media is giving the American people exactly what they ask for. Frightening isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-45630</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/softballing-presidential-debates#comment-45630</guid>
		<description>It gets worse in the Presidential debates where Democrats square off against Republicans and noone else is allowed to play.  Could you have imagined Bush debating Ralph Nader for the last two elections?  What a sweet sight that would have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gets worse in the Presidential debates where Democrats square off against Republicans and noone else is allowed to play.  Could you have imagined Bush debating Ralph Nader for the last two elections?  What a sweet sight that would have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.connorboyack.com @ 2012-02-12 13:04:40 -->
