<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bigger They Are, The Softer They Fall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall</link>
	<description>Rants and musings about things political, philosophical, and religious.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrien</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57232</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57232</guid>
		<description>My favorite quote of the day:

&quot;Just because God created the world in seven days doesn&#039;t mean we have to pass this bill in seven days,&quot; said Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite quote of the day:</p>
<p>&#8220;Just because God created the world in seven days doesn&#8217;t mean we have to pass this bill in seven days,&#8221; said Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57227</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57227</guid>
		<description>Well, don&#039;t be too hard on yourself. At least you were able to change your mind in 2004. That&#039;s always difficult, and many people couldn&#039;t manage it. I seem to remember that Utah went for Bush &lt;i&gt;county for county&lt;/i&gt;, which I&#039;m still scratching my head over.

In fact, we could have used a few more of you in Ohio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, don&#8217;t be too hard on yourself. At least you were able to change your mind in 2004. That&#8217;s always difficult, and many people couldn&#8217;t manage it. I seem to remember that Utah went for Bush <i>county for county</i>, which I&#8217;m still scratching my head over.</p>
<p>In fact, we could have used a few more of you in Ohio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark N.</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57224</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57224</guid>
		<description>Back in 1999, I voted for Bush-Cheney, being disgusted with the shenanigans that Clinton had put us through, thinking that with Cheney in there, there might actually be some &quot;grownups&quot; in charge of things for a change.

Boy was I wrong.  Needless to say, Bush-Cheney did not get my vote in 2003.  (With the Electoral College being what it is, and with California being what it is, I can say that my Bush-Cheney vote in 1999 was negated by my fellow Californians, which has consoled me to a certain extent.)

However, it definitely makes me wonder if I am capable of identifying the &quot;grownups&quot; in any given election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 1999, I voted for Bush-Cheney, being disgusted with the shenanigans that Clinton had put us through, thinking that with Cheney in there, there might actually be some &#8220;grownups&#8221; in charge of things for a change.</p>
<p>Boy was I wrong.  Needless to say, Bush-Cheney did not get my vote in 2003.  (With the Electoral College being what it is, and with California being what it is, I can say that my Bush-Cheney vote in 1999 was negated by my fellow Californians, which has consoled me to a certain extent.)</p>
<p>However, it definitely makes me wonder if I am capable of identifying the &#8220;grownups&#8221; in any given election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57213</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57213</guid>
		<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_09/014821.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hilzoy&lt;/a&gt; of the Washington Monthly.

&quot;First: throughout all this, I&#039;ve been torn between believing in market discipline and wanting to avoid moral hazard on the one hand, and thinking that of course that commitment flies out the window if we&#039;re seriously threatened with economic collapse, on the other. But it&#039;s worth remembering that we could have avoided having to choose between these unfortunate options. All we needed to do was have people in government who believed in good regulation.

&quot;Second: if anyone ever tells me that Republicans are the party of fiscal discipline ever again, I will either dissolve in laughter or bite their heads off. I don&#039;t know which. You have been warned.

&quot;Third: in particular, if any Republican ever tells me that a hundred million or so is just too much to pay to make sure that kids have health insurance, I will definitely bite his or her head off.

&quot;Fourth: I do not want to hear people tell me that regulation cripples the economy, unless they are willing to admit that a lack of regulation can also cripple the economy. Not ever. I don&#039;t understand why anyone is so much as tempted to think that &quot;regulation&quot; is good or bad, as a whole: to me, that&#039;s like being for or against &quot;things&quot; or &quot;people&quot;. Some regulations are good, some are bad; obviously, we want people in government who can tell the difference, and implement regulatory systems that work well. However, altogether too many of my fellow citizens were willing to listen to ideologues, and now we all get to pay for their mistakes.

&quot;Fifth: if Obama wins, he and the Democrats will, in all probability, have to be the grownups once again. Reagan spent us blind; Clinton got us out of debt again. Now Bush has spent us even blinder, and we will be tempted, yet again, to put our ideas and aspirations on hold for the sake of the country.

I would like to hear one Republican, just once, acknowledge this fact.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_09/014821.php" rel="nofollow">Hilzoy</a> of the Washington Monthly.</p>
<p>&#8220;First: throughout all this, I&#8217;ve been torn between believing in market discipline and wanting to avoid moral hazard on the one hand, and thinking that of course that commitment flies out the window if we&#8217;re seriously threatened with economic collapse, on the other. But it&#8217;s worth remembering that we could have avoided having to choose between these unfortunate options. All we needed to do was have people in government who believed in good regulation.</p>
<p>&#8220;Second: if anyone ever tells me that Republicans are the party of fiscal discipline ever again, I will either dissolve in laughter or bite their heads off. I don&#8217;t know which. You have been warned.</p>
<p>&#8220;Third: in particular, if any Republican ever tells me that a hundred million or so is just too much to pay to make sure that kids have health insurance, I will definitely bite his or her head off.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fourth: I do not want to hear people tell me that regulation cripples the economy, unless they are willing to admit that a lack of regulation can also cripple the economy. Not ever. I don&#8217;t understand why anyone is so much as tempted to think that &#8220;regulation&#8221; is good or bad, as a whole: to me, that&#8217;s like being for or against &#8220;things&#8221; or &#8220;people&#8221;. Some regulations are good, some are bad; obviously, we want people in government who can tell the difference, and implement regulatory systems that work well. However, altogether too many of my fellow citizens were willing to listen to ideologues, and now we all get to pay for their mistakes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fifth: if Obama wins, he and the Democrats will, in all probability, have to be the grownups once again. Reagan spent us blind; Clinton got us out of debt again. Now Bush has spent us even blinder, and we will be tempted, yet again, to put our ideas and aspirations on hold for the sake of the country.</p>
<p>I would like to hear one Republican, just once, acknowledge this fact.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly W.</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57204</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57204</guid>
		<description>Hey, if the USA is broke, can we quit funding the wars? I think the Iraq War alone is costing us about two billion dollars per week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if the USA is broke, can we quit funding the wars? I think the Iraq War alone is costing us about two billion dollars per week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoot Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57203</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoot Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57203</guid>
		<description>A good time it seems, for Americans with a boatload of &quot;unsecured&quot; debt to say, &quot;Screw It&quot;.  And dump them back into the credit card/banks hands.  After all, won&#039;t the Government bail us out as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good time it seems, for Americans with a boatload of &#8220;unsecured&#8221; debt to say, &#8220;Screw It&#8221;.  And dump them back into the credit card/banks hands.  After all, won&#8217;t the Government bail us out as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Staheli</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57201</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Staheli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57201</guid>
		<description>Adrien,

You said that it would be worse if AIG were to default on its obligations.  IT HAS BEEN DEFAULTING ON ITS OBLIGATIONS FOR MONTHS AND MONTHS ALREADY.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://economicspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/09/aig-bailout-some-still-dont-know-that.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It is time to stop the rapine&lt;/a&gt;, because it will only get worse if we continue to allow the Republican AND Democrat shysters in government to bail out their friends.  This bailout will not help the average you and me.  It only further lines the pockets of those who are in the know.  

Can I have part of AIG&#039;s bailout money to replace the $9,000 my retirement account has lost in the last 3 days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrien,</p>
<p>You said that it would be worse if AIG were to default on its obligations.  IT HAS BEEN DEFAULTING ON ITS OBLIGATIONS FOR MONTHS AND MONTHS ALREADY.  <a href="http://economicspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/09/aig-bailout-some-still-dont-know-that.html" rel="nofollow">It is time to stop the rapine</a>, because it will only get worse if we continue to allow the Republican AND Democrat shysters in government to bail out their friends.  This bailout will not help the average you and me.  It only further lines the pockets of those who are in the know.  </p>
<p>Can I have part of AIG&#8217;s bailout money to replace the $9,000 my retirement account has lost in the last 3 days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mecham</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57197</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mecham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57197</guid>
		<description>I wrote a complimentary post on my blog about corporate bailouts and being allowed to fail and succeed without government intervention. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.successofliberty.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a complimentary post on my blog about corporate bailouts and being allowed to fail and succeed without government intervention. <a href="http://www.successofliberty.com/" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrien</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57193</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57193</guid>
		<description>Ok then, which religion is deemed to be the right one for conservatism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok then, which religion is deemed to be the right one for conservatism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57192</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57192</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Hey, religious right folks! Adrien here says you&#8217;re not real conservatives. Are you?&lt;/em&gt;

Religion != Conservatism.

Besides, the epithet &quot;conservative&quot; has been so misused as to be rendered void of any inherent meaning.  The same applies to &quot;liberal&quot;, which has been neutered of its original definition and applicability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Hey, religious right folks! Adrien here says you&rsquo;re not real conservatives. Are you?</em></p>
<p>Religion != Conservatism.</p>
<p>Besides, the epithet &#8220;conservative&#8221; has been so misused as to be rendered void of any inherent meaning.  The same applies to &#8220;liberal&#8221;, which has been neutered of its original definition and applicability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly W.</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57191</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57191</guid>
		<description>This week&#039;s Gospel Doctrine lesson is about Helaman 13 to 16. This is where Samuel the Lamanite prophesies to the wicked Nephites about the curses that will come to them before the coming of Christ to the world if they did not repent.

President Benson told us the conditions of the Nephites would mimick our own day before the Second Coming.

Samuel told them of the main curse to come, that their treasures and money would become &quot;slippery&quot; to them. They would bury up their treasures, but they would be gone the next day.

I believe that is exactly what is happening before our eyes. People will bury up their riches in Lehmann or AIG, and the next day they&#039;re gone.

Samuel told the Nephites how to avoid this slipperyness. They should bury up their riches unto the Lord who gave them the riches, instead of burying them up to serve their own vanity.

Are the current economic failures directly related to our own wickedness and failure to bury up our riches unto the Lord, which thereby activates the blessing/curse of the B of M upon the land?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s Gospel Doctrine lesson is about Helaman 13 to 16. This is where Samuel the Lamanite prophesies to the wicked Nephites about the curses that will come to them before the coming of Christ to the world if they did not repent.</p>
<p>President Benson told us the conditions of the Nephites would mimick our own day before the Second Coming.</p>
<p>Samuel told them of the main curse to come, that their treasures and money would become &#8220;slippery&#8221; to them. They would bury up their treasures, but they would be gone the next day.</p>
<p>I believe that is exactly what is happening before our eyes. People will bury up their riches in Lehmann or AIG, and the next day they&#8217;re gone.</p>
<p>Samuel told the Nephites how to avoid this slipperyness. They should bury up their riches unto the Lord who gave them the riches, instead of burying them up to serve their own vanity.</p>
<p>Are the current economic failures directly related to our own wickedness and failure to bury up our riches unto the Lord, which thereby activates the blessing/curse of the B of M upon the land?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly W.</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57190</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57190</guid>
		<description>I think the current economic collapse of the world&#039;s largest economy was prophesied many years ago. Please read chapter 18 of the Book of Revelation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the current economic collapse of the world&#8217;s largest economy was prophesied many years ago. Please read chapter 18 of the Book of Revelation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrien</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57189</link>
		<dc:creator>adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57189</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, I forgot that being politically conservative means having small town values.  What was I thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, I forgot that being politically conservative means having small town values.  What was I thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57188</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57188</guid>
		<description>I thought the religious right were considered conservative because they have small-town values and don&#039;t eat funny lettuce.

But are you saying our good host Connor isn&#039;t a real conservative because he&#039;s pushing for laws against gay marriage?! Now I&#039;m confused. 

Let&#039;s go to the horse&#039;s mouth. Now where can we find some religious right people? Maybe right here!

Hey, religious right folks! Adrien here says you&#039;re not real conservatives. Are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the religious right were considered conservative because they have small-town values and don&#8217;t eat funny lettuce.</p>
<p>But are you saying our good host Connor isn&#8217;t a real conservative because he&#8217;s pushing for laws against gay marriage?! Now I&#8217;m confused. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go to the horse&#8217;s mouth. Now where can we find some religious right people? Maybe right here!</p>
<p>Hey, religious right folks! Adrien here says you&#8217;re not real conservatives. Are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrien</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57186</link>
		<dc:creator>adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57186</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, I forgot bigger government with Homeland Security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, I forgot bigger government with Homeland Security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrien</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57185</link>
		<dc:creator>adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57185</guid>
		<description>Close but no CIgar.  The religious right really aren&#039;t the traditional conservatives.  As Ron Paul points out, they have been pushing for more and more laws (the whole gay marriage thing as well as the whole carding people under 40 for beer in Arizona), they have been promoting policing the world, and increasing government spending.  In what way are the religious right conservative?

Communism really has never been tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Close but no CIgar.  The religious right really aren&#8217;t the traditional conservatives.  As Ron Paul points out, they have been pushing for more and more laws (the whole gay marriage thing as well as the whole carding people under 40 for beer in Arizona), they have been promoting policing the world, and increasing government spending.  In what way are the religious right conservative?</p>
<p>Communism really has never been tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57184</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57184</guid>
		<description>There haven&#039;t been any &lt;a href=&quot;http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=No_True_Scotsman&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;True Scotsmen&lt;/a&gt; either.

And Communists say that pure Communism has never been tried.

It&#039;s a nice song, but you get none of my spare change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There haven&#8217;t been any <a href="http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=No_True_Scotsman" rel="nofollow">True Scotsmen</a> either.</p>
<p>And Communists say that pure Communism has never been tried.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nice song, but you get none of my spare change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrien</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57182</link>
		<dc:creator>adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57182</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you noticed, but we haven&#039;t had real conservatives around since the 60s when Goldwater was running.  The so-called religious right doesn&#039;t really fit the bill of a pro-market capitalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you noticed, but we haven&#8217;t had real conservatives around since the 60s when Goldwater was running.  The so-called religious right doesn&#8217;t really fit the bill of a pro-market capitalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57181</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57181</guid>
		<description>Conservatives are typically pro-market and anti-regulation, if I may generalise.

That is, they&#039;re against the government regulation that might have prevented this catastrophe in the first place.

How&#039;s that working?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives are typically pro-market and anti-regulation, if I may generalise.</p>
<p>That is, they&#8217;re against the government regulation that might have prevented this catastrophe in the first place.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that working?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrien</title>
		<link>http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/the-bigger-they-are-the-softer-they-fall#comment-57179</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connorboyack.com/blog/?p=723#comment-57179</guid>
		<description>Ha. . . the people don&#039;t know how to interpret it.  That&#039;s why he&#039;s so popular.  If only they truly understood the negative impact his policies would make. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. . . the people don&#8217;t know how to interpret it.  That&#8217;s why he&#8217;s so popular.  If only they truly understood the negative impact his policies would make. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
